Soda Tax: Not the Answer

To the Editor:

Re “What a Big Tax on Soft Drinks Can Do” (editorial, Oct. 19):

Discriminatory taxes on beverages do not improve public health, and they divert us from meaningful solutions to complex health challenges.

In the few places where they have been tried, excise taxes that single out beverages have been shown to have no effect on obesity. West Virginia and Arkansas have longstanding soda taxes and continue to rank in the top 10 most obese states. States with no soda tax, such as Massachusetts and Vermont, are among the least obese states. Even a report by the European Commission that looked at the effect of taxes on common grocery items found “no robust conclusions on the impact of food taxes on public health.”

Regarding a soda tax in Mexico, even the Times editorial board acknowledges there is no proof that public health improved as a result of the tax. What has happened is the closing of more than 30,000 neighborhood stores in part because of the tax, says Mexico’s National Association of Small Merchants.

If we want to get serious about obesity and other complex health issues, it starts with education and collaboration to inform people how to maintain a balanced lifestyle. Taxes will not help.

SUSAN NEELY

President and Chief Executive

American Beverage Association

Washington

New York Times

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s